Article content material

In her March 2023 federal funds, Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland mentioned she was elevating taxes on higher-income Canadians to make sure they “pay their justifiable share,” however a brand new examine exhibits the prime 20 per cent of income-earning households already pay extra in whole revenue taxes than the opposite 80 per cent do.

Article content material

“Lately there have been rising calls to extend taxes on high-income earners based mostly on the idea that they don’t pay sufficient taxes,” mentioned the Fraser Institute’s Jake Fuss, who co-authored the report Measuring Progressivity in Canada’s Tax System, launched Tuesday, together with economist Nathaniel Li.

Article content material

“There’s sometimes little dialogue about how a lot tax every revenue group pays,” Fuss mentioned.

Boosting tax charges on the idea that upper-income earners aren’t paying a justifiable share is a coverage based mostly on false reasoning, the report concludes.

“The highest 20 per cent of revenue incomes households in Canada pay over half of the nation’s taxes,” Fuss mentioned.

“That’s clearly a disproportionately giant share of the tax burden.”

Article content material

Information within the report are based mostly on the institute’s Canadian tax simulator. The examine separates revenue classifications into 5 teams, or quintiles. The underside 20 per cent earn as much as $59,270 yearly, whereas these in quintile 2 earn between $59,271 to $104,048. Quintile 3 earners make between $104,049 and $159,040 per 12 months, and people within the fourth make $159,041 to $243,798. These within the highest quintile earn  greater than $243,799 per 12 months.

In response to the examine, Canadian households that rank within the backside 20 per cent of revenue earners pay 0.7 per cent of all federal and provincial revenue taxes, whereas receiving simply over 5 per cent of Canada’s whole household revenue.

“Put otherwise, the share of whole revenue acquired by the primary quintile is greater than seven instances bigger than their share of revenue taxes paid,” the report states.

Article content material

Households that fall throughout the second quintile pay 4.6 per cent of all revenue taxes, whereas receiving 10.1 per cent of all revenue.

Related patterns exist throughout the third and fourth teams, the examine discovered.

“Likewise, the share of revenue earned exceeds the share of PIT (private revenue tax) paid for the third and fourth quintiles by 4.4 share factors and a pair of.0 share factors, respectively,” the examine states.

Canadians who rank among the many prime 20 per cent of wage earners, nonetheless, pay extra in private revenue taxes in comparison with their share of whole reported revenue.

“Prime revenue earners pay about 16 share factors greater than their share of whole revenue,” wrote the authors.

“Though this revenue group earns a big portion of whole household revenue, it’s paying greater than its share of revenue taxes when measured on a proportional foundation.”

Article content material

Elevating taxes on high-income earners, the examine maintains, will solely immediate them to take measures to keep away from these larger tax burdens, Fuss mentioned.

“If you’re rising tax charges, a part of the issue is which you can alter the tax base, as a result of individuals begin to have interaction in numerous habits and shift round property,” Fuss defined, saying this habits can even embrace shifting to areas with decrease tax charges, or partaking in additional tax planning with legal professionals and accountants to cut back their tax payments.

For instance, the examine cites a 2010 initiative in the UK that added a brand new prime private revenue tax bracket that elevated tax charges for top-earners from 40 to 50 per cent, which the federal government anticipated would end in an extra 2.5 billion British kilos in tax income.

Article content material

Reasonably than a rise, a report revealed six years later confirmed that the transfer truly yielded lower than half that quantity, prompting the U.Ok. authorities to decrease its prime tax price to 45 per cent.

“Simply since you suppose you’re going to realize further income from elevating taxes, doesn’t imply it’s truly going to be the case,” Fuss mentioned.

Franco Terrazzano, federal director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, mentioned controlling authorities waste is a extra smart approach to stability the funds than elevating taxes.

Article content material